Thu, 14 Apr 2016
By Syful Islam
At least four people died and many were injured at
Banshkhali in Chittagong earlier
this month, when police opened fire at violent protests against the
construction of a 1,320-megawatt (MW) coal plant in the southeastern coastal
area.
In response, the government unofficially said on April 9
that work at the $2.4 billion power plant would be suspended for 15 days, while
it carries out an assessment of the plant's environmental impact, led by
Bangladeshi and foreign scientists.
Environmentalists say the risks those fossil fuel plants
could pose to nature and the livelihoods of local people are not being properly
investigated.
Anu Muhammad, member secretary of the National Committee to
Protect Oil, Gas, Mineral Resources, Power and Ports, said the Banshkhali plant
does not have an approved environmental impact assessment (EIA), yet private
company SS Power Ltd - a joint venture between Bangladeshi and Chinese firms -
has already started work at the site.
"The site selected is located in a coastal area where
climate change risk is high," he said. "Establishing such plants in
coastal areas will be dangerous."
POWER-HUNGRY
Monowar Islam, secretary of the government's power division,
said Bangladesh
is a power-hungry country that needs huge amounts of electricity to develop.
It is highly dependent on natural gas reserves that are
dwindling, he said. "We have no other options but to go for coal - the
long-term solution is coal-based power plants," he told the Thomson
Reuters Foundation.
Currently only 2 percent of Bangladesh 's
power is generated using coal.
Islam said the advanced technology now used in coal-fired
plants would curb the environmental risks cited by opponents.
The Banshkhali plant has yet to get its EIA report vetted by
the department of environment, but the plant already has site clearance, he
noted.
The plant cannot be relocated, as the process to select the
site took five years, he added.
SUNDARBANS THREAT
There is fierce opposition to another planned coal plant in
Rampal, near the protected Sundarbans, the world's largest mangrove forest. The
plant is a joint project between the state-run power companies of Bangladesh
and India .
"The government of Bangladesh
is overlooking people's concerns," said Atiq Rahman, executive director of
the Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies.
Even the department of environment has raised questions over
the EIA for the Rampal plant, conducted by the ministry of energy, he told the
Thomson Reuters Foundation.
"There was no public and experts' participation in the
EIA. Laws have not been followed properly in this case," Rahman said.
The government did not explore alternative sites for the
Rampal plant even though environmentalists and local people have waged a
long-running campaign against the possible damage it could cause to the
low-lying Sundarbans, a world heritage site.
"There is administrative arrogance," Rahman said.
UNESCO officials recently visited the Sundarbans to assess
the possible impact of the power plant on the flora and fauna of the mangrove
forests.
In the past, when oil tankers and boats carrying fertiliser
sank in the Shela River
near the Sundarbans, the U.N. body expressed concern over possible harm to
biodiversity.
Ainun Nishat, a respected environmentalist and professor
emeritus at Brac University
in Dhaka , said the department of environment had
approved the EIA report for Rampal - but with many conditions attached.
"Everything should be as per the laws concerned. The
government should fulfill all these conditions before setting up the
plant," he said.
IMPORTANT ECOSYSTEMS
Md Khalequzzaman, professor of geology at Lock
Haven University
in Pennsylvania , said Rampal was
not the best place for a coal-fired power plant.
"There are valid concerns about the proposed plant
being so close to the Sundarbans," he said by e-mail.
"No country with a commitment to preserve ecologically
sensitive areas, including India ,
will allow such a plant on their ground, and Bangladesh
should not allow it either."
"The Sundarbans is too important an ecosystem to fiddle
or experiment with," he said.
Khalequzzaman urged the government to look at alternative
energy scenarios, and to come up with a long-term energy policy that fits with
the global shift towards sustainable development.
Abu Naser Khan, chairman of the Save Environment Movement,
said the Rampal plant would one day turn into "cancer" for the
Sundarbans.
"The government should give importance to environmental
concerns and local people's anxiety before setting up any coal-fired power
plant," he added.